LEGISLATIVE UPDATE
TO: CEOs,
Presidents & Legislative Contacts
FROM: Charles M. Miller, SVP / Director of Legislation
& Regulation
DATE: February 6, 2009
________________________________________________________
House Bill 1204 got what it
needed and nothing more – that is 75 yes votes.
This legislation to raise the tobacco tax in Arkansas needed 75% of the House of
Representatives in order to move to the Senate for consideration, which it did
on Thursday. HB 1204 will increase the
current tax on cigarettes by 56 cents and fund health related programs in our
state. What started out as a mechanism
to fund a state-wide trauma system has morphed into much more. If passed by the Senate, the legislation will
fund the trauma system, expand coverage for the ArKids First program, add
revenue to community heath centers and substance abuse programs as well as fund
a new northwest Arkansas campus for the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences.
Of particular interest to us
as bankers is the fact that the alternate funding bill for the trauma system
did not advance. HB 1238 proposed to
raise the needed money through increases in various fines and earmarking
insurance premium taxes. Banks, as all
do all businesses, pay premium taxes, therefore the ABA is opposed to this legislation.
We are still working with the
Department of Finance and Administration (DF&A) on a solution to obvious
problems created by the forged lien release case out of Washington County. Unfortunately, DF&A has come up with
little regarding suggested changes in their policies or legislation. Therefore, I have asked a few of my
colleagues at other state bankers associations how their state law would
address such a case.
As far as dollars sent
directly from banks to the State of Arkansas,
i.e. assessments paid by Arkansas
banks, we continue to watch two bills.
HB 1137 is the Bank Department’s appropriation for 2009-10, and it is
still under consideration by the Joint Budget Committee. Senate Bill 10 would convert our assessments
to general revenue and remove the Bank Commissioner’s control of these
revenues. We maintain our position that
assessments paid by banks should be used for no other purpose but to regulate
banks.
Let me mention one more bill
that we are currently tracking. Senate
Bill 32 would require motor vehicle liability insurers to include the vehicle’s
listed lien holder as payees on claims for damage in excess of $500. Although not filed at our request, the ABA is supporting this
legislation because it could help protect a bank’s collateral by insuring that
a vehicle is repaired when it is damaged.
The insurance lobby has been strongly opposed to SB 32; however, they
did offer an amendment this week. I am
not sure if the used car dealers association will agree to the amendment but it
appears that the bill’s sponsor would like to compromise.
In spite of the fact that we
have only had a few direct threats to our industry during this session, your
Association persists in representing the banks of Arkansas.
As the only trade association devoting full time lobbyists to this
industry, we are at the Capitol every day answering legislators’ questions and analyzing
each bill that is introduced.